Archive for the ‘Vienna Conventions’ Category

  • OBSERVE THE REPUBLIC DAY OF INDIA 2017 AS ‘BLACK DAY’ IN PROTEST AGAINST THE DECISION OF THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA TO INVITE THE ‘CROWN PRINCE OF ABU DHABI’ AS THE CHIEF GUEST OF THE DAY!

    Date: 2017.01.16 | Category: Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, ADIA, Al-Jazeera, Arbitration, Authoritarianism, Boycott Etihad Airways, Boycott Etihad Flight, Delhi High Court, Democracy, Dictators, Diplomatic Protection, Etihad Airways, Extortion Abu Dhabi, Human Rights, Human Rights Watch, India, India & UAE, Indian Diplomacy, Indo-Gulf Reparations, International Law, Investors duped, Investors sue UAE, Journey From Hell, Judgment Creditor, Judgment Creditor’s Case, Judgment Debtor, Kadmat Island Tourism, Legacy of Torture in UAE, Migrant Workers, P.K. Jabir, punishment, Reparation Mechanisms, Republic Day 2017, Sarah Leah Whitson, Saudi-UAE Dictators, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Sheikh Saif, Sovereign Wealth Fund, UAE Constitution, UAE Judgment Equities, UAE Judgments For Sale, UAE’s $3bn Judgment Debts, United Arab Emirates, Vienna Conventions, White Paper, Willful Defaulters | Response: 0

    Observe the ‘Republic Day of India 2017′ as ‘Black Day’ in Protest Against the Decision of the Government of India to Invite the ‘Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi’ as the Chief Guest of the Day!wilful-defaulters-uae

    An Open Appeal to all Indians on the Occasion of the 68th Anniversary of India’s Republic Day 2017!

    If We Really Stand For The Independent India, The Values of Democracy and Respect For Human Rights: “Observe The Republic Day of India 2017 As ‘Black Day’, on the following Crystal Clear Reasons:-

    Abu Dhabi crown prince, Sheikh Mohammed Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, is invited to be the chief guest of India’s Republic Day 2017. To add fuel to the fire the “UAE Army has also been invited to participate in the Republic Day Parade 2017″ during which the chief guest will be the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi.

    Mohammed Bin Zayed represents the UAE as the de facto ruler of UAE Federation. UAE is attributed to authoritarian regime with blood-stained hands, lacks accountability and total lack of judicial independence. Any one who dares to criticize the regime risk arrest, torture, arbitrary detentions and enforced disappearance.

    The Army in question was trained by the notorious company once known as ‘BlackWater’, and recruited foreign mercenaries, originally intended to butcher their citizens who claim for democracy. The UAE is a member of Saudi-led ‘anti-terror’ coalition on which the Pakistani army chief [retired] Gen Raheel Sharif is the head.

    The UAE and its army both have proved by meddling its neighbouring countries that the victory of the people against any repressive regime in the Arab world is more dangerous than defeat!

    ENFORCEMENT OF LANDMARK UAE JUDGMENTS – ‘JABIR CASE’

    Most importantly, there’s no respect for even the Judgments of the Supreme Court of that country. The UAE Federation is the worst wilful defaulter of the 4 consecutive Judgments passed against them by the Courts of Abu Dhabi in the most shocking and gruesome case of an Indian investor’. During the course of hearing the wrong-doers pleaded guilty ‘of their framing a false case against the Indian investor’ to withdraw a civil lawsuit of a building contract.

    The Court of First Instance in Abu Dhabi, UAE, had specifically ordered investigation against their corrupt and conniving officials who looted money and valuables from the office of Indian investor. The Full Bench of the Apex Court unanimously upheld the findings, precisely in line with the Lower Courts’ Judgments.

    The UAE Federation did not comply with the Judicial directives of the Courts of Abu Dhabi. Instead, the Federation deliberately and maliciously deported him, the ‘Judgment Creditor’, from the UAE, denying him access even to his business assets spread over three establishments in Abu Dhabi, UAE, were worth One Hundred Million US Dollars in 1995.

    This resulted his character assassination, leaving him in a whirl-pool of unimaginable mental trauma and thus the UAE Federation is accountable for its violation of Judicial decisions at first place.

    His claims against UAE were recognized by both the Supreme Court and the High Court of Delhi and ordered the Government of India to settle the case in two months, way back in 1997! All that is pending is the ‘execution of those Judgements, solely due to the inhuman approach of the concerned authorities representing both India and UAE.

    A vicarious liability exists under general law. The violation of a specific directive of a Court of Law, renders the Abu Dhabi, UAE Federation, as a ‘Wilful Defaulter’, liable for the compensation due to the Petitioner, the ‘Judgment Creditor’.

    Under the above grave backgrounds, the Abu Dhabi crown prince cannot be made in a list of the distinguished chief guests of India’s Republic Day Celebrations. The Republic Day of India commemorates the date January 26, 1950, on which the Constitution of India came into force.

    Indians celebrated Republic Day all these years to strengthen the dynamics of a democratic values and to honour India’s great men and women who had sacrificed all the way. We were quite fair so far, when we had distinguished personalities like Obama, Hollande etc., as our Chief Guests on our Republic Day ceremonies in the past.

    The ‘Judgment Creditor’ is therefore soliciting your wholehearted support in his unique case to get Justice, in a portfolio of Landmark Judgments passed in absolute in his favour, by the highest Judiciary of Abu Dhabi and subsequent Judgments from Delhi High Court in the case, the benefits of which have been denied to him arbitrarily and inhumanly over an unduly long period of two decades, defeating all his relentless fight.

    The ‘Judgment Creditor’ wishes to observe India’s Republic Day 2017 as a Black Day, in Protest Against the Non-enforcement of Legal Judgments” by both the Governments, the Government of UAE and the Government of India!

    He requests all Indians to join him in his protest against the decision of the Government of India with all supports to him.

    Promoted by: ‘Alliance Judgment Recovery’

    In support of:
    Legal Cell; Lawyers India; Reparation Law; Judgment Creditor
    https://www.Facebook.com/AllianceJudgmentRecovery/
    https://www.Facebook.com/JudgmentForSale/
    https://www.Twitter.com/JudgmentForSale/
    https://www.Twitter.com/RepublicDay2017/

    Link To Articles

    Legal Instruments & References – The Multi Billion Dollars Judgment Portfolios of UAE.

    VISIT ARCHIVES:-
    Judgments and documents relating to ‘Judgment Creditor’

    LET’S JOIN; TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO SUPPORT JUSTICE
    “Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”

    CROWDFUNDING STRATEGY TO ENFORCE UAE JUDGMENTS

    “Support the “Judgment Creditor” to strengthen the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in our Justice System”.
    “Invest In ‘Justice’ 1,000% Returns! – Read Brochure”


    FREE REFERRAL PARTNER PROGRAMME:-

    How do I become a ‘Referral Partner’?
    Referral Partner Program is Absolutely Free to Join

  • MULTI BILLION DOLLAR UAE JUDGMENT FOR SALE!

    Date: 2016.10.19 | Category: Abu Dhabi Police-Looting, ADIA, Al-Jazeera, Arbitration, Authoritarianism, Brilliant Lawyers Wanted, Delhi High Court, Dictators, Diplomatic Protection, Etihad Airways, Extortion Abu Dhabi, Fraudulent Statements, Freedom of Expression, Human Rights, Human Rights Watch, India, India & UAE, Indian Diplomacy, Indo-Gulf Reparations, International Law, Investors duped, Investors sue UAE, Judgment Creditor, Judgment Creditor’s Case, Judgment Debtor, Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, Legacy of Torture in UAE, Multi-billion Dollars Case, P.K. Jabir, Reparation Mechanisms, Sarah Leah Whitson, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Sheikh Saif, Sovereign Wealth Fund, UAE Judgment Equities, UAE Judgments For Sale, UAE’s $3bn Judgment Debts, United Arab Emirates, US Caselaw, Vienna Conventions, White Paper, Willful Defaulters | Response: 0

    Equity-based Crowdfunding for UAE Decrees Enforcement; the World's Best Ever Debt Funds to Buy, the Debtor is the Ruler of UAE!

    MULTI BILLION $USD WORTH ‘JUDGMENT-DEBTS’ OF UAE FOR SALE!

    Wednesday 19 Oct, 2016 New Delhi [Reparation Law News] ‘Download ‘Authentic Copy (PDF: 1200 kb)

    MULTI BILLION $USD WORTH ‘JUDGMENT-DEBTS’ OF UAE: – THE ‘UAE JUDGMENT DEBTS’ AGAINST THE ‘ABU DHABI EXECUTIVE BRANCH’ ARE GUARANTEED “TEN TIMES MORE VALUE IN THREE YEARS PERIOD” AND FIVE TIMES MORE VALUE ON YOUR INVESTMENT EVEN IF THE DEBTORS SETTLE IT WITHIN THE FIRST WEEK OF YOUR JOINING!
    READ FULL TEXT: “SALE BROCHURE”!

    1) INTRODUCTION.
    Article submitted by Panikkaveetil K. Jabir, Founder-CEO, M/s. Overseas Indians Legal Cell (hereinafter referred to as the Judgment Creditor).

    The Judgment Creditor is an Indian National. Despite the social and other difficulties, the Judgment Creditor established a career as Electro-Mechanical Engineer. He had valuable experience in the said field by working in projects of International Repute like Voltas and Lufthansa in Mumbai, India.

    In the prime of his youth, when aged 22, he reached Abu Dhabi, the capital of the UAE in 1979. UAE at that time was a fast developing country. He had been an active participant in its developmental activities. Due to tireless efforts and commitment to his profession, he could establish and develop three major business establishments in Engineering, Trading and General Contracting in Abu Dhabi that valued at about a hundred million U.S. Dollars by 1995.

    2) BEGINNING OF HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION.

    The Judgment Creditor, on behalf of his principal company, the ‘Premier General Contracting Establishment’, entered into a lease and build-out agreement with Hassan Saeed Hassan, a local Emirati, in September 1995, regarding a nine storied building.

    With the rapid progress of the proposed project, Hassan Saeed grew greedy, and conspired to have the lease obligation set at naught with a view to make enormous gains. the Judgment Creditor could not and did not yield to the unjustified demands of Mr. Hassan Saeed, as the Judgment Creditor had already entered into commitments with others on the basis of the planned business deal.

    3) FIRST APPROACH TO THE COURT OF LAW.

    When Hassan Saeed attempted to break the provisions in the lease agreement, and even sold some of the flats to others violating the terms and conditions of the contract, the Judgment Creditor, as a law abiding citizen, sought legal advice and instituted a civil suit in the Abu Dhabi Court.

    Hassan Saeed was, however, reacting in a most unreasonable and arbitrary manner. He threatened the Judgment Creditor with dire consequences if he failed to withdraw the Civil Suit.

    The Court was, prima facie, satisfied by the contentions of the Judgment Creditor, and passed an interim order protecting his rights. There was a direction to deposit the contracted value in the Treasury. Hassan Saeed was informed about the direction and the possible serious consequences in the event of his illegal action and violation of the Court order were indicated.

    4) THE GRUESOME ACTS OF VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

    The stand taken by the Judgment Creditor was lawful, reasonable, and had the support of the Court’s interim order. ‘But in total negation of the Judicial Order of Abu Dhabi Civil Court, Hassan Saeed continued threatening the Judgment Creditor and planned and executed violent and reckless revenge, defying all legal provisions and principles of fair-play. Certain corrupt police officials colluded with him. In consequence thereof, the Judgment Creditor had to undergo extremes of inhuman and deadly tortures from Abu Dhabi Police which no human being could withstand. However, he was fortunate to be spared from death.

    The crude and cruel manner of the attempts to break the contract i.e. the aggression, police-looting and the connivance of local police, illegal arrest, arbitrary detention, malicious claim, torture etc., are detailed chronologically in a representation [link] submitted to the Ministry of External Affairs, Delhi, on 28 October, 2013 in reply of its Letter [link] No.G/3139/2013/MEA (Gulf Division) dated 10th October, 2013. Some of the events [link] are also featured in the following articles. The Judgment Creditor may continue the narrative in brief herein so as to complete the story.
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    [‘Judgment Creditor Booklet to Enforce UAE Judgments’; ‘The Uniqueness of Judgment Creditor’; ‘Abu Dhabi Police-looting’; ‘The Worst Cheating Scandal of Abu Dhabi Debtor‘; “Truth and Justice are being nakedly sacrificed for UAE’s Reputation”; Untold sufferings inflicted as an under-trial prisoner at the brutal ‘Al Wathba Central Prison, Abu Dhabi‘, detailed herein ‘The legacy of torture in the UAEand ‘The Prison-life in Abu Dhabi’; The Loss of Business Firms & Assets of the Judgment Creditor In Abu Dhabi, UAE‘; ‘ And more.’]
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    On Thursday 26th October 1995 around Noon, Hassan Saeed trespassed into the private office of the Judgment Creditor along with his accomplice, a policeman in plain clothes, who held a heavy iron rod of one meter length in one hand and a chained handcuff on the other hand.

    The policeman enquired as to the original documents of the contract which the Judgment Creditor refused to disclose. On this, the entire office was ransacked, drawers opened by force and files thrown out. Thereupon, the policeman forcibly broke open the office locker with the iron rod in his hand and looted US$.4m worth money and valuables and the Judgment Creditor was severely beaten in cold blood and his fingers were smashed with iron rod.

    At this juncture, the younger brother of the Judgment Creditor arrived at the office with lunch. As he arrived the Judgment Creditor asked him to close the door and call the police. By then, the policeman in plain clothes managed to get out of the office with the stolen money and valuables; however, Mr.Hassan Saeed was unable to leave.

    It was noticed by the Judgment Creditor that the policeman in civil dress had returned and was shouting and striking on the door with the heavy iron rod of one meter length he held in his hand. By then an inquisitive crowd had gathered around the office of the Judgment Creditor. The policeman was shouting and warning anyone from coming near to him and was saying rather rudely “Pakistani, Bengali, Indian all are thieves and procurers”.

    After some time, the police patrol team arrived at the spot as per the request made by the Judgment Creditor. But instead of protecting him from the trespassers, they joined hands with the trespassers, acted like mere savages, and the victims (the Judgment Creditor and his brother) were shackled, brutally tortured and were literally dragged out of the office through the street to the police vehicle in the presence of known friends and bystanders and taken to an underground detention centre. They were abused and assaulted there again and the Judgment Creditor fell unconscious. Eventually they were taken to hospital emergency.

    5) ARBITRARY ARREST AND DETENTION – A VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

    The wanton acts of infraction of damage to the Judgment Creditor, his office and equipment were temporarily halted only when, pursuant to a telephone call of the Judgment Creditor’s brother, a police team arrived at the scene. In the mean time, a large crowd had gathered at the scene, and there were very many respectable persons from different parts of the world who could witness the incident.

    Unfortunately, the police team acted in accordance with the dictates of Hassan Saeed, due to extraneous considerations and undue influence, money and otherwise. Hassan Saeed manipulated, with the connivance of police, the arrest and detention of the Judgment Creditor.

    Thus the business deal bona fide entered into, and scrupulously adhered to by the Judgment Creditor, led to very serious deprivation of his liberty, which consisted of a series of violations of Human Rights such as a forcible destruction of his property with the connivance of corrupt police officials, illegal arrest, torture of the worst order leading to his unconscious condition, perilously near death, incarceration in prison, and other physical and mental sufferings. It took about six months for the Judgment Creditor being brought before a Court of law of Abu Dhabi, UAE.

    6) A CONTENTION ABOUT HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION ARISING FROM THE ARREST.

    It is respectfully submitted that this default in not producing the accused promptly before a competent judicial authority, by itself is a serious violation of the rights guaranteed to a victim under the fundamental principles of international law. The Judgment Creditor was not produced before a Court, i.e. within a day, or some of the weeks. It took a long period of six months thereafter, for the Judgment Creditor to have his first appearance in the Court.

    He was held incommunicado for about a month in different detention centres, often in solitary confinement, and finally taken to the central prison. During this long spell of illegal detention, he was treated in the most cruel manner, subjected to brutal torture and blackmail, causing him irreparable mental and physical injuries. The Judgment Creditor was exposed to such a gross violation of Human Rights which the competent authority could take serious notice of. Each day of such illegal incarceration is to be reckoned while devising the remedial measures.
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Article 9 (3) is particularly relevant and read:

    “Any one arrested or detained on a criminal charge shall be brought promptly before a Judge or other officer authorized by law to exercise judicial power and shall be entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release”. [Link: International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations].

    & the UAE had breached Articles 9 of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) that condemns arbitrary arrest: ‘No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile. [Link: Universal Declaration of Human Rights]
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    7) THE LEGAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE, ABU DHABI, UAE.

    The Human Rights Violations, the assault, arbitrary detention etc as narrated above were scrutinized by the Court. The Court had the opportunity to have evidence before it from witnesses belonging to different nationalities.

    The witnesses of foreign nationals (other than Indian) were in a position to give evidences, despite the fear of a possible harassment by Abu Dhabi Police and public prosecution. This ensured the independent quality of the evidence.

    The arrest and detention were against the basic principles of law. The arrogant policemen of Abu Dhabi, however, committed the atrocities in full view of the public. This proved to be their undoing.

    8) THE REACTION OF THE COURT.

    The Court expressed its shock while noticing that a victim who sought for police help from trespassers was arrested and detained by the police!

    9) THE JUDGMENT AND FINDINGS OF THE COURT.

    The Judgment of the ‘Legal Court of First Instance’ was pronounced on 10-04-1996.

    The Judgment Creditor and his brother who were charged with offences by the Abu Dhabi Police, were acquitted. The Court directed the Authorities, to prosecute the policeman involved in the illegal activities. It was found that Hassan Saeed was guilty of deception and assault. The Court criticized the Public Prosecution for concealing the assault of the policeman on the Judgment Creditor, and its tampering of evidence. Some of the material findings of the Court are:-

    i) The policeman and Hassan Saeed had committed the offences of trespass and assault.

    ii) The Judgment Creditor had only exercised his legal right, and he and his brother were attacked by the policeman and Hassan Saeed by taking the law into their hand.

    iii) The police, which was expected to help the victims, unjustifiably protected the trespassers who were the law breakers.

    iv) The Criminal Court observed that, the Interim Judgment of the Abu Dhabi Civil Court, ruled that the Judgment Creditor was the really aggrieved person and had deserved help.

    v) The conduct of the police clearly proved the malicious motives in initiating the criminal complaint against the Judgment Creditor.

    vi) Ultimately, the Court found that the policeman indulged in the illegal criminal act due to his greed, and that the police framed false charges against the Judgment Creditor to save their face.

    10) DIRECTIONS OF COURT – AN ENQUIRY INTO THE CONDUCT OF POLICE.

    The Court took a serious view of the entire events. It ordered an enquiry into the conduct of the police. The records were forwarded to the Public Prosecution for facilitating the investigation.

    The order of the Court, regrettably enough, was ignored by the UAE authority. No investigation was conducted by the prosecution. The irresistible inference is about an active Police-partisanship to help the law-breakers, who wanted to make wrongful gains, utilizing their influence, and access to the ruling power.

    The State has to bear the responsibility for such illegal actions indulged in by servants and officers and for helping anti-social elements with the full connivance of its policemen and other officials.

    The claim of the Judgment Creditor is based on solid judicial verdict of a Court of the very country in which the illegal actions took place. [Link: The Judgment of the 'Court of First Instance - Final Decree' ]

    11) SERIOUS VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE CHARTER OF THE U.N.

    The Judgment Creditor was NOT released from prison in spite of his acquittal by the Criminal Court of First Instance, in total violation of the order of a judicial authority.

    At the same time, there was an alleged omission to proceed against the perpetrators of the crime, in spite of the directions of a judicial authority. This too is a serious violation of Human Rights guaranteed by the law, both the domestic law and the charter of United Nations.

    12) CONTINUATION OF LEGAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE APEX COURT.

    Ultimately, the prosecution filed an appeal in the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi. The case was posted for hearing on 18-04-1996.

    13) APEX COURT ORDER GRANTING BAIL TO THE ‘JUDGMENT CREDITOR’.

    The Court granted bail to the Judgment Creditor on the day the prosecution filing an appeal. However, despite the bail and sureties the Judgment Creditor was not released from the prison.

    14) INTERVENING EVENTS CONFIRMING VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND ADMISSION OF POLICE ABOUT SUCH VIOLATIONS.

    In the meantime, policeman Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Kadir filed a declaration dated 17-03-1996, attested by a Notary, where-under he dropped the contentions in his complaint. Hassan Saeed followed the suit and admitted his guilt. The two other policemen submitted that they were misguided by Ahmed Abdulla Abdul Kadir in committing arrest and torture against the Judgment Creditor with a view to extort money.

    The Hon’ble Supreme Court advised the Judgment Creditor to sue against the perpetrators of the crime for damages and malicious actions.

    15) JUDGMENT OF UAE SUPREME COURT WHICH AFFIRMED THE LANDMARK RULING OF LOWER COURT.

    The final Judgment of the Supreme Court was rendered on 19-05-1996. The Hon’ble Supreme Court declared that the Judgment Creditor was totally innocent of the charges. The case hoisted against the Judgment Creditor was wholly false, baseless and fabricated by the police for personal gains. The Court observed further that all the pieces of evidence proved propriety in the acts and conduct of the Judgment Creditor.

    The conduct of the Prosecutor was strongly condemned. Referring to the principles of Islamic Law, the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi observed that the law had honoured the man who protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. A person dying while protecting that freedom is considered a ‘martyr’.

    With regard to the facts of the case, Supreme Court observed that it was proved that the policemen and other officials sought to arrest the Judgment Creditor without any right and that they curtailed his freedom.

    [Link: The Judgment of the 'Apex Court of Abu Dhabi, UAE]

    16) UAE GOVERNMENT CONTINUED VIOLATION OF COURT ORDERS AND PERPETRATED VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

    The defiant Executive, however, continued the violation of Human Rights. Despite the acquittal by the Trial Court, the grant of bail by the Supreme Court and dropping the charges by his complainant, and finally, the Supreme Court’s declaration precisely in line with the Lower Courts that the Judgment Creditor was totally innocent of the charges, the ongoing arbitrary detention of Judgment Creditor and his brother continued indefinitely.

    17) CONTENTION AGAINST THE NON ENFORCEMENT OF UAE COURT’S DECISIONS.

    The eminent Jurists Panel of Apex Court cross-examined all aspects of the case and found that the accused was innocent; rather ‘a martyr’. This judgment of the very country in which the police and the Executive Officers perpetrated violation of Human Rights against the Judgment Creditor, held that the Police was answerable for their criminal action.

    The ‘Debtor’, the Government of Abu Dhabi, UAE, is responsible for such a grave violation of Human Rights and reparation is legitimately to be reckoned for every day of the deprivation of liberty and violation of Human Rights by the officers and servants of the UAE.

    18) AGGRAVATED VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS BY [FRAUD] DEPORTATION RESULTING IN LOSS OF HIS DIGNITY, RESPECT AND ENTIRE PROPERTY.

    Strangely enough, and shocking, the judicial conscience, and giving a jolt to the basic concept of Human Rights, the Judgment Creditor was deported on 28- 09-1996 to India with false and fabricated records without any asset, dignity and respect whatsoever. [Link: The ‘Executive Order of Deportation’ – an ‘extremely fraudulent misrepresentation’, dated 28-09-1996 Abu Dhabi, UAE]

    Yet another gross violation of Human Rights was the dare devil action of the Executive of deporting the Judgment Creditor from the country as if the Judgment Creditor was convicted for a crime by the ‘Court of Law’, ignoring the concurrent judicial declaration of the Courts in UAE, the Court of First Instance and the Supreme Court. While so deporting the Judgment Creditor, the Executive Branch was well aware that ‘the reason shown in the deportation order was against the truth.

    The deportation order was prepared with the false and fabricated statement, with an intention to save face and simultaneously to avoid paying any reparations. The fraud committed by the Executive Branch of Abu Dhabi has caused grave injury to the Judgment Creditor, that has left him in the worst position than he was in before the fraud.

    The U.S. Supreme Court has quoted that, “There can be no doubt that the continuation of a malicious prosecution beyond the initial act of instigation may inflict additional damage upon the victim”.

    The competent authority could be justified to pass further orders appropriately dealing with the concerned officers and compensating the Judgment Creditor by awarding compensation which will take in the value of his businesses, freedom or dignity and the assets, lost by him due to the criminal actions of the administration and other officials of the UAE, along with other heads of damages permissible under law.
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    The U.S. Supreme Court has quoted that, “There can be no doubt that the continuation of a malicious prosecution beyond the initial act of instigation may inflict additional damage upon the victim”; [Ray Wong v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc. (1926) 199 Cal. 15 [247 P. 894]. ‘The term ‘prosecution’ is sufficiently comprehensive to include every step in an action from its commencement to its final determination…’ (Lujan v. Gordon, 70 Cal.App.3d 260.)
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    19) CONTENTIONS REGARDING THE CONDUCT OF UAE GOVERNMENT.

    It may be recalled that the UAE government was blamed of having been instrumental in defrauding or cheating the Judgment Creditor to avoid honoring its moral obligations and assigned responsibilities. The Judgment Creditor was subjected to total deprivation of his liberty, his business establishments, loss of his accumulated savings and properties, and a great suffering in his dignity as a human individual. Each deprivation by itself justifies the strongest action by the competent authority, in the light of the solid evidence placed before it.

    Deprivation of the entire property and life savings constitute a grave violation of Human Rights and the very Right to Life. There are multiple infractions of Human Rights, which constitute a more serious case calling for strongest action on the part of the competent authority. The right to livelihood cannot be subjected to individual fancies of the person in authority.

    20) ATTRIBUTION OF CONDUCT TO THE STATE.

    The ‘Debtor, the Government of Abu Dhabi, UAE‘ will stand as the fiscally responsible party until the Court Judgment is satisfied. His responsibility to do so will pass on to his successor-in-office; the successor regime is obliged to compensate the victim of state wrongs.

    Under international law, the state is responsible for all actions or omissions of its officials and organs. This is the function of the basic rules of international law concerning the responsibility of States for their internationally wrongful acts and the legal consequences which flow therefrom. The ‘successor governments’ also remain bound by the acts incurred by the ‘predecessor governments’.

    A three-judge Supreme Court bench in India has observed recently that Decree Holders must enjoy the fruits of the decree obtained by them in an expeditious manner – “It is necessary to remember that success in a suit means nothing to a party unless he gets the relief”. [Reference to the links below].
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    ‘HERE WE TAKE A LOOK AT WHAT’S THE LEGAL POINTS OF INTEREST’:

    * The Constitution of the UAE and the ‘Arab Charter on Human Rights’ envisages many protective measures under the law. The Article 26, of the Constitution of the UAE it reads:

    ‘Personal liberty is guaranteed to all citizens. No person may be arrested, searched, detained or imprisoned except in accordance with the provisions of law. No person shall be subjected to torture or to degrading treatment’.

    But what the UAE government practice is exactly the opposite of what they preach; making the UAE Constitution itself becomes a solemn mockery! [Link: http://reparationlaw.com/caselaw/constitution-of-the-u-a-e/ ]

    * The Arab Charter on Human Rights, adopted on 15 September 1994 by the League of Arab States, where the UAE is a party. [Link: http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b38540.html ]

    *Wife of the late King of Saudi Arabia has won the right to sue his son, Saudi prince for breaching a contract [Link:“The Doctrine of State Immunity” ]

    * “Decree Holders Entitled to Enjoy Fruits of the Decree Expeditiously” – Says Supreme Court of India ! [Link: ‘Supreme Court Judgment’ ]

    * “How does fraud affect a victim? ‘The impact of fraud on victims’ – Supreme Court of India [Link: ‘Supreme Court Judgment’ ]
    ————————————————————————————————————————————

    21) DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF TORTURE – HOSPITALIZATION AFTER REACHING IN INDIA.

    The Judgment Creditor was admitted in ‘Hinduja hospital’ Mumbai, by the very next day of his release from UAE Prison. There he was treated by different doctors at different specialties including psychiatrists. The Judgment Creditor had a greater degree of psychological stress and physical harm as a consequence of brutal methods used by the Abu Dhabi police under detention. He was advised Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments, Diabetic treatments etc., due to the Pancreas disorder symptoms.

    22) PURSUIT OF LEGAL REMEDIES IN INDIA.

    The Judgment Creditor fought for justice by invoking all legal flora, including the High Court of Delhi and the Supreme Court of India. The various legal proceedings, costly and time-consuming, are chronicled in [Links] Part A & Part B of the Annexures. They cover events commencing from filing the Writ Petition before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in 1996. The Supreme Court found merit in the case suggested that the Delhi High Court could be approached in the matter under Article 226.

    The Delhi High Court by its judgment dated 20-11-1997, directed the Government of India to settle the issue within two months of the date of the judgment. [Link: In the High Court of Delhi, Appellate Civil Jurisdiction]

    There was continuous and contumacious delay on the part of the Government of India. No order was passed as directed by the Delhi High Court. This necessitated the Judgment Creditor to approach the Delhi High Court again in 2003. There was an interim order on 28-1-2004 that the Government should intimate the Court of the steps taken to protect the rights of the Judgment Creditor.

    The second Judgment of Delhi High Court was rendered on 19-9-2007. It recorded a letter of the Ministry of External Affairs dated 29-7-1998 reading:-

    “We are taking up the matter with our Embassy in Abu Dhabi once again, requesting them to pursue the case at appropriate level”. [Link: Second Judgment of the Delhi High Court - 2007]

    The Government of India, did not take any action on the order of Delhi High Court, as well as repeated representations and communications from the Judgment Creditor, despite the fact that the most cruel violation of Human Rights and deprivation of freedom or property of the Judgment Creditor had been repeatedly established by judicial verdicts in a foreign country.

    23) FURTHER REPRESENTATIONS FOR DIPLOMATIC ACTION BASED ON VIENNA CONVENTIONS.

    The International Conventions on Diplomatic and Consular Relations, outlines the rules of law for safeguarding the interests of NATIONALS of the sending States and the treatment of envoys between states. Both the States, India and the UAE are parties to the present Conventions. The functions of Diplomatic Missions according to the Vienna Convention is listed below.
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    Article 5 & 36 of the ‘Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’ specify the duties of consular officials’ when citizens of their country face difficulties in a foreign State.

    Representation to Government of India: [Link: ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ Timeline Highlighting Submissions & Responses]

    [Link: Article 5 & 36 of the ‘Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’] – Done at Vienna, Austria on 24 April 1963. It consist, inter alia, in: (e) helping and assisting nationals, both individuals and bodies corporate, of the sending State.

    And also under the Article (3)(b) in the ‘Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) – Done at Vienna on 18 April 1961′; the functions of a diplomatic mission under VCDR consist in: (b) Protecting in the receiving State the interests of the sending State and of its nationals, within the limits permitted by international law.

    How Far Must We Protect Our Citizens Abroad? Edwin Montefiore Borchard (1884-1951)
    ————————————————————————————————————————————

    24) INDIA HAD BREACHED ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS.

    The government of India is in clear breach of its international obligations under the Article (5)(e) Consular Functions of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’ – Done at Vienna, Austria on 24 April 1963.

    The victim here a citizen of India who has been suffering all through ever since he was a victim of a violent extortion racket in Abu Dhabi police that targeted him. he was illegally arrested, brutally tortured, arbitrarily imprisoned and being held incommunicado and deported illegally from the UAE without any asset whatsoever to India.

    The Dignity and Rights of the ‘Judgment Creditor’ was not restored by the Executive authority of Abu Dhabi, as directed by both the Courts, the Court of First Instance and the Supreme Court, Abu Dhabi, UAE.

    The Government of India has not been able to get justice for the Judgment Creditor so far, except a cruel and deliberate betrayal over the past two decades”. Virtually, the Judgment Creditor was transferred from one cage to another, his freedom or dignity and his professional life continues to be denied indefinitely despite his running from pillar to post, to restore his dignity and respect and to recover his assets.

    Further about the UN Articles on Diplomatic Protection, it has been codified by the existing customary International Law on the protection of NATIONALS abroad or whose Property Rights have been unlawfully violated abroad by a foreign government. [Link to the Article is given below].
    ————————————————————————————————————————————
    The doctrine of ‘international responsibility’ [Link: The ‘Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power’ (Adopted by General Assembly resolution 40/34 of 29 November 1985)

    The Articles on Diplomatic Protection: In May 2006, the International Law Commission (ILC) has adopted the Articles on Diplomatic Protection, These articles largely codify existing customary international law on the protection of nationals abroad by means of diplomatic protection. [Link: Articles on Diplomatic Protection]

    Indian expatriates are exposed to the extreme degree of Human Rights Violations in the Arab Gulf. [Link: India's National Shame!]
    ————————————————————————————————————————————

    25) FURTHER FACETS OF VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS.

    The brutal torture of the Judgment Creditor at the Abu Dhabi prisons have caused him irreparable and serious physical ailments. As a result, at his advanced age, he is suffering now great strain, physically and mentally. the Judgment Creditor’s two children and wife who are also subjected to great sufferings as a result of the unjust deprivation of his entire property and their sustenance and facilities of life. The unabated agonies of the Judgment Creditor continues for over two decades. the Judgment Creditor’s younger brother who suffered great physical pain and mental anguish has also taken its toll on his life.

    26) THE UN WORKING GROUP ON ARBITRARY DETENTION (UNWGAD).

    In February 2016, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (UNWGAD) announced its decision finding that the detention of WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is unlawful. The United Nations Working Group has ordered that the Swedish and British authorities to end Mr. Assange’s deprivation of liberty, respect his physical integrity and freedom of movement, and afford him the right to compensation.

    The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (UNWGAD) had given inspiration to the suffering individuals in various parts of the world by its glorious Judgment in Assange’s case. A laudable principle was also declared. Various forms of deprivation of liberty “constitute a form of arbitrary detention”. [Link: The Judgment in Assange’s case]

    An illustrative precedent of UN Working Group in meting out justice to a person whose Human Rights had been violated are grave criminal acts and serious violation of Human Rights justifying the intervention of the UN Working Group.

    Assange lost in all legal proceedings including the appeal to the highest Court in United Kingdom. The UN Working Group, however, meted out justice to the deserving individuals, when fact established beyond doubts the violation of Human Rights.

    27) CONCLUSION.

    In the case of the Judgment Creditor, there has been integrated and connected activities on the part of the policemen and the officials of Abu Dhabi, UAE and the UAE Government itself in arresting without justifiable reasons; malicious and deliberate misuse of power, subjecting him to torture, violating the provisions of production of an accused in a Court of Law, prolonged arbitrary detention, disregarding the verdict of the judiciary on the innocence of the victim, and violating the basic principles of a civilized Government of honouring verdict of the judiciary, Executive abiding by such verdict.

    The Legal Court of First Instance of Abu Dhabi was declared that the conduct of the policemen clearly proved the malicious motives in initiating a criminal complaint against the Judgment Creditor. However, an order of enquiry passed by the Legal Court [Link] against the conduct of the Policemen was ignored by the UAE authority. The conduct of the Prosecutor too was condemned.

    The relevant portion of the Final Judgement [Link] of the Supreme Court of Abu Dhabi, praising the qualities of the Judgment Creditor and condemning the malicious actions of his ‘debtors’ is reproduced here for ready reference:-

    “All the pieces of evidence proved propriety in the acts and conduct of the Judgment Creditor. With regard to the facts of the case, the Supreme Court observed that the law had honoured the man who protected his freedom, his honour, his property and his soul. A a person dying while protecting that freedom is considered a martyr. And it was proved in this case that the policemen and other officials sought to arrest the ‘Judgment Creditor’ without any right and that they curtailed his freedom”.

    The illegal deportation of the Judgment Creditor by the Executive of Abu Dhabi, UAE, on fraudulent grounds has multiplied the devastating effects on the victim, such as:-

    His dignity and freedom remained lost arbitrarily as he was deported on a ‘fraudulent order’ [Link] issued by UAE Administration purposefully in order to avoid honouring its obligations. His entire assets and properties remained lost; as he was denied access to his three major business establishments [Link] and assets in Abu Dhabi, UAE, that caused ‘Multi-billion Dollars’ worth of damages;

    His dignity, respect and all his assets remains lost even after two decades of passing the ‘Historic Judgments of the Highest Court of Abu Dhabi, due to non-enforcement of Judgments. The anguish resultant from the deprivation of his freedom, dignity and property, as such the huge business assets, earned only through his untiring personal efforts causes mental depression which will virtually make the life only a vegetable existence.

    Thank You!

    Panikkaveetil K. Jabir,

    Founder-CEO, M/s. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell.

    Link To Articles

    Legal Instruments &References – The Multi Billion Dollars Judgment Portfolis of UAE.

    VISIT ARCHIVES:-
    Judgments and documents relating to ‘Judgment Creditor’

    LET’S JOIN; TELL YOUR FRIENDS TO SUPPORT JUSTICE
    “Alliance Judgment Recovery Networks”


    ENDNOTES:-

    CROWDFUNDING STRATEGY TO ENFORCE UAE JUDGMENTS

    “Support the “Judgment Creditor” to strengthen the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in our Justice System”. “Invest In ‘Justice’ 1,000% Returns! – Read Brochure”

    BUY JUDGMENT PORTFOLIO NOW:-

    Funds are proposed to be raised by distribution of shares. JFS – Funds Transfer

    FREE REFERRAL PARTNER PROGRAMME:-

    How do I become a referral partner? Referral Partner Program is Absolutely Free to Join

    MISSION STATEMENT
    Safeguard the Rule of Law by ensuring Justice, Freedom and Peace in society.

    CASE LAW | RESOURCES | ALLIANCE | PUBLICATIONS | NEWS ROOM

    The ‘UAE Court Judgments’ are Worth Buying, in all Respects

    The UAE officials are committed to honour the content of the obligation to execute the Court Judgments now available for sale to general public. The execution of the Judgment, it is inferred, is only delayed. “A victim of crime cannot be a “forgotten man” in the criminal justice system“. View the statements and documents …More Details

     

     

  • The worst cheating scandal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    Date: 2014.08.01 | Category: Abu Dhabi, ADIA, April, Arbitration, Authoritarianism, Boycott Etihad Airways, Boycott Etihad Flight, Citigroup, December, Delhi High Court, Dictators, Diplomatic Protection, Etihad Airways, February, Fraudulent Statements, Freedom of Expression, Human Rights, Human Rights Watch, India, India & UAE, Indian Diplomacy, Indo-Gulf Reparations, International Law, International Tourists, Investors duped, Investors sue UAE, January, Jet-Etihad Deal, Judgment Creditor, Judgment Debtor, Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, Legacy of Torture in UAE, Migrant Workers, Mrs Justice Rose, Other, Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, P.K. Jabir, Protests, punishment, Reparation Mechanisms, Sarah Leah Whitson, Saudi Arabia, September, Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed, Sheikh Saif, UAE Judgments For Sale, United Arab Emirates, US Caselaw, Vienna Conventions | Response: 0

    Photograph: The Judgment Debtor, the Late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, Former UAE President and Ruler of Abu Dhabi Emirate

    The Judgment Debtor, the Late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, Former UAE President and Ruler of Abu Dhabi

    The worst cheating scandal of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE)
    August 01, 2014 Reparation Law News, New Delhi

    The Judgment Debtor, the Late Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, Former UAE President and Ruler of Abu Dhabi Emirate

    [The title, the ‘judgment debtor’ is reserved to describe the person who owes the judgment creditor the amount (damages) stated in the criminal judgments and has not paid the debt. In common law in the UAE, the debtors will be jailed until they have paid their debt.]

    The ‘Judgment Creditor’ was entitled to execution of the Judgments and levies the Police Department of Abu Dhabi, worth hundreds of million US Dollars as compensation to restore his life, his dignity and his business establishments.

    The debtor in the ‘UAE Court Judgments’, is the State of UAE whose Ruler at the time was none other than the late Sheikh Zayed himself, the Emir of Abu Dhabi and absolute Ruler of the United Arab Emirates (UAE). It may be recalled that the Emir was blamed of having been instrumental in defrauding or cheating the Judgment Creditor to avoid honoring his moral obligations and assigned responsibilities.

    The Judgment Creditor is an Indian businessman and investor, who was deprived of his valuable rights guaranteed by FOUR successive Judgments (1 Civil & 3 Criminal Court Judgments) from the Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates (UAE); and TWO consecutive Judgments from the High Court of Delhi, after approaching the Supreme Court of India in October, 1996.

    The businessman was victimized by the officials of Abu Dhabi, UAE, and the subject matter of his grave complaints were adjudicated by the Courts in Abu Dhabi and Delhi which concurrently found the multiple forms of crime taking place under the wings of the ‘Ministry of Interior United Arab Emirates (UAE)’, such as fraud, forgery, extortion, torture and many other offences.

    Both the Courts in Abu Dhabi, the Court of First Instance and the Apex Court were fully satisfied with the highest standard of proof, beyond any doubt that the Police was guilty. The Court observed that all the pieces of evidence indicated the proper behavior of the victim and held that he is innocent; rather ‘a martyr’. The Apex Court comprised of three Judges passed a ‘Landmark Judgment’ in the history of UAE.

    The head of the State have a ‘constitutional duty’ to faithfully execute the judicial orders of the country. Any civilized Government is bound to implement the verdict of the judiciary, as that is the basic requirement of the Rule of Law. ‘Laws governing the international community’ do require compliance by the Executive Government, in full measure, with the verdict of the judiciary. This requirement of law was breached by the UAE Government. Instead of enforcing the judgments, the Judgment Creditor was expelled from the country by an arbitrary administrative action, resulting in total destruction of his life, his businesses and his profession.

    The administrative action of the UAE was totally illegal and arbitrary, as the Executive cannot override or overrule a decision of the very Courts of the country that ruled reparation to a victim; defrauding the judgment creditor is a personal and vindictive action; it is unofficial and illegal. The UAE Government owes huge debts to the creditor, solely and exclusively responsible for the closure of “his various ‘business establishments’ in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates”.

    The ‘legal fight for justice’ took in very many proceedings before the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi. Despite the directive of the Delhi High Court, the Government of India has not discharged its duties as indicated in the judicial order.

    The enforcement of UAE judgment that was delayed and denied for a long period of nearly two decades has to be satisfied without any further delay so that the ‘Judgment Debtor(s)’ could avoid unpleasant consequences that will follow. The creditor holds full power of the Foreign Courts as well as the Domestic Courts to support his claim and to take debtor’s property (lien) in the UAE, where the judgment is recorded, if the obligation is not discharged.

    The recent decision of the London High Court on ‘Harb v HRH Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz, Saudi Arabia has marked a turning point in the doctrine of ‘State Immunity’ of Foreign States. The landmark decision of Royal Courts of Justice, reaffirm the Rights of Judgment Creditor to pursue his enforcement efforts against the UAE debtors!

    The lawyers for Prince Abdul Aziz, the king’s son, argued he had “state immunity” and the court had no jurisdiction to try the claim of Mrs Harb, who was the “secret” Christian wife of the late King of Saudi Arabia. But the learned Judge of the London High Court, Mrs Justice Rose threw out the prince’s argument, opening the way for a full hearing of the case which risks embarrassing the House of Saud.

    Some important points of the judicial decision includes (a) the ‘personal immunity ceases when a head of state is no longer, for whatever reason, in office’ ; (b) the ‘head of a state enjoy immunity only in respect of their official acts whilst in office’ ; (c) a ‘successor regime is obliged to compensate the victim of state wrongs’. The Court also relied on Article 39 of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961. Under this provision, immunity ratione personae, personal immunity, for an ambassador lasts only while he or she is in office. [‘London High Court on ‘Harb v HRH Prince Abdul Aziz Bin Fahd Bin Abdul Aziz, Rose J, [2014] EWHC 1807 (Ch),09/06/2014′].

    The Government of India is duty bound to safeguard the interests of its citizen who was victimized by Abu Dhabi, UAE, the receiving state. But even after the lapse of nearly two decades, the Government of India has totally failed to help, implement judicial orders of the UAE and of Delhi High Court. These actions and omissions on the part of the Government is contrary to the ‘Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963’ particularly Article 5, enforced from 19-3-1967. A recent judgment of the Supreme Court which casts liability on a Government for the delay in the disposal of the complaints of a citizen, even when the delay is at the instance of a Legal authority or Tribunal.

    Endnotes:

    We intend to give wide coverage to the issue in public interest; to protect innocent people, of being exposed to the kinds of brutal, inhuman tortures (mental, physical and economic) and to safeguard the interests of UAE Judgment Creditors in future.

    The campaign includes ‘Selling the UAE Judgments’ and ‘Selling the Film Rights’, the rights to produce both a book and a movie based on the facts of ‘Unexecuted UAE Judgments’.

    Reference Links:

    Reminder Notice to the Government of India
    It is fervently hoped that the new Government will duly consider taking the necessary steps to execute the judgments through all means, including the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the principal judicial body of the United Nations (UN), on behalf of the judgment creditor. …

    Reminder Notice: The Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi – July 16, 2014
    India’s ‘National Shame’: ‘The MEA & MOIA’
    Documents Archive: Jabir Case

    Features on ‘Human Rights in the UAE’

    Resource Links:

    UAE Judgments For Sale! – What does it mean?

    ’Judgment for sale’ is a campaign, primarily organized by voluntary member contributions. It’s a value added, investment campaign, aimed to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud or other heinous acts to avoid honoring their obligations. As a lawful owner of a legal Judgment, the winner has every right to offer his un-executed Judgments for sale or to make efforts to legally enforce and recover his assets and the inherent rights of individuals to dignity. (‘Read more at FAQ’)

    Court Judgments are not worthless piece of papers!

    When an issue arises, the aggrieved party files a suit, conduct the same through able counsel, present relevant documents and witnesses before the court and the case is heard at length. It is after a lengthy legal procedures that the Hon’ble Judges pronounce the judgment, giving due weight to every aspect of the case. The aggrieved party is greatly relieved on getting judgment in his favour. He is full of hope, relief and happy on winning the case. From the day next, he wait for the execution of the judgment and receiving benefits thereof.

    Together, let’s end Judgment Fraud in the UAE! (Read more at ‘How do I become a voluntary contributor?’)

    Photograph: Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, founder of UAE, the first President, also the Emir of Abu Dhabi’
    First Published: ‘CNN iREPORT’

    “Be you never so high, the law is above you,” as Dr. Thomas Fuller wrote in 1733

    It’s widely accepted principles of law, that an act or omission contrary to international law is “breach of an engagement” that triggers “an obligation to make reparation in an adequate form”. … JFS

     

  • Khobragade scandal sheds new light on India’s rotten diplomacy

    Date: 2014.02.08 | Category: Delhi High Court, Indian Diplomacy, International Law, Judgment Creditor, Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, P.K. Jabir, Vienna Conventions | Response: 0

    US-President-Barack-Obama-and-Manmohan-Singh-IndiaKhobragade scandal sheds new light on India’s rotten diplomacy
    February 08, 2014 New Delhi. Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell

    Obama has described that the relationship between India and United States would be one of the “defining partnerships” of the 21st century while visiting the country in 2010, praising its tradition of tolerance and its free market economy. The latest diplomatic rift between India and the U.S. shows all its ‘diplomatic triumphs’ turned upside down in a chaotic manner, exposing India’s deliberate failure to adhere to the statutory duties and state responsibilities under international law.

    The gruesome experiences of the writer of the last 18 years in dealing with the Ministry of External Affairs have been briefed separately. They reveal the cruelties of Abu Dhabi authorities and the inaction of the MEA, the Government of India in spite of the order of the Delhi High Court.

    Unfortunately, India’s concept of “diplomacy” is often misconstrued and put to maximum abuse by their officials. Some privileged elites in the MEA, New Delhi, irrespective of their caliber, seniority and eligibility, manage to get themselves inducted into diplomatic missions with ulterior motives. Such people lack the experience of professional diplomacy; bring ill-fame to the nation when they attempt to make undue financial gains through indecent means.

    The officials of MEA, Government of India approached over the Devyani Khobragade issue, without properly conceiving the fathoms of International treaty laws, the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations (VCCR) 1963 and the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (VCDR) 1961. They lacked deep knowledge of the rules governing the Consular Functions including the various categories of Diplomatic Immunity of the members of a diplomatic mission. [Article 5 & 36 of the VCCR specify consular officials’ duties when citizens of their country face difficulties in a foreign State(3)].

    Criminal elements are also flourishing in India under the guise of ‘diplomatic immunities and reciprocal privileges or treatments’. The case of a senior UAE diplomat who smuggled about 37 kg of gold worth at least US$2 million (Rs.11 crore), last year, into New Delhi International Airport is just an example. The Directorate General of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) has taken up the matter with the Ministry for action against the diplomat who is still at large. The MEA responded that the UAE diplomat enjoys immunity under international law, from criminal, civil and administrative jurisdictions of the receiving State.

    Khobragade’s arrest on December 12, 2013 and subsequent strip-search sparked outrage in India and prompted a range of retaliatory measures in Delhi against U.S. diplomats. The very concept of the solemn document, the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 has been misinterpreted in India in this case, as it has been grossly misinterpreted in the case of Italian Ambassador to India in 2013.

    The United States anti-trafficking strategy set forth in December 23, 2008; the President Bush signed into law a bill that enhances measures to combat human trafficking. ‘The Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2008′ was named after English abolitionist William Wilberforce, who led the Parliamentary movement against the British slave trade in the early 19th century.

    The U.S. has also agreed to ‘UN Protocol against trafficking in persons’ who provides a working definition of human trafficking and a common basis for criminalizing the trafficking of persons, especially women and children. Devyani Khobragade, 39, India’s deputy consul general in New York is the third Indian diplomat to be accused of cheating the U.S. authority from trust to trafficking.

    On January 08, 2014 Khobragade was granted G1 visa with full diplomatic immunity by the State Department, which then asked India to waive the immunity so that she could face the charges. That request was refused and the State Department then requested her immediate departure. The next day she left New York for India. The same day, Khobragade was indicted by a federal grand jury in Manhattan. The indictment said Khobragade had made multiple false representations to U.S. authorities. The indictment accuses her and others of trying to “silence and intimidate the victim and her family and lie to Indian authorities and courts.”

    The description about ‘a series of efforts to intimidate the victim, Sangeeta Richard and her family in India’ reveals the ill-equipped and possibly abusive actions of the Indian authorities over the Khobragade affair. In a letter to the judge, U.S. prosecutors said “we will alert the court promptly if we learn that the defendant returns to the United States in a non-immune capacity, at which time the government will proceed to prosecute this case and prove the charges in the indictment.

    We should applaud Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the southern district of New York, for taking a victim-centered approach in this case. The U.S. authority and attorney Dana Sussman of Safe Horizon representing Ms Richard, who has taken every step under law to protect the victim and her family; they were flown to a safety zone, safe in every respect, until completion of the legal proceedings in the case.

    There’s a very important message from the great city of United States, New York, that ‘all the progressive and democratic governments must adopt a ‘victim-centered approach’ in their criminal justice process and thereby modernizing and strengthening the Integrity of the Judiciary and people’s confidence in their justice systems’.

    The External Affairs Ministry of India has already done great damage to the Nation’s image by its wrong presumptions and hasty actions in dealing with the situation. Sincere efforts are to be made at appropriate levels to regain its glory.

    A victim of repeated betrayal and deception by the MEA, New Delhi:
    [The case of a “Judgment Creditor”, the writer, who has been kept waiting for the past 18 years for justice]

    The writer is a torture survivor of inside the regime’s brutal prison in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and most importantly a THREE times of Judgment Creditor (winner) from the Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Government of India has never risen to the occasion against the brutality and humiliation inflicted upon an Indian citizen in UAE despite multiple judgments from that country in his favour.

    A ‘serial entrepreneur’ in Abu Dhabi, UAE, engaged in the business of Trading, General Contracting etc., he had a dispute arose with a local landlord. He instituted a civil suit in Abu Dhabi Court for settling the issue. An interim order was granted by Abu Dhabi Court of Justice in his favour.

    The landlord, in collusion with local police, turned against the writer (the petitioner) and took recourse to all illegal means to withdraw the ‘Civil Suit’. On October 26, 1995, the petitioner was brutally tortured and literally dragged out of his office along the street in the presence of known friends and bystanders. He was confined to a detention center where he had to undergo extremes of cruelties and humiliation from Abu Dhabi Police which no human being can withstand. After four months of his illegal detention, a false case was registered against the petitioner, alleging “Using force against Government employee and assault”. It took six months thereafter, for the petitioner to have his first appearance in Court.

    The innocence of the petitioner had been ultimately upheld by the Hon’ble Judge of Abu Dhabi Legal Court of First Instance. The Court found that, the Prosecutor was guilty of proceeding against the petitioner. The Court acquitted the petitioner of all the charges leveled against him and directed the authorities to prosecute the policeman involved and also the landlord – for being guilty of deception.

    The office of the public prosecutor, Abu Dhabi filed an appeal against the decree of the legal court of the first instance. The case finally came up before the Apex Court, comprising the three-judge panel. The petitioner was granted bail on the filing of the appeal. However, despite the bail and sureties he was not released from the prison. During the hearing, the police officer dropped his claim from his complaint with a declaration attested by the Notary Public. Finally, the landlord and the prosecutor followed suit and told that they have absolutely no case against the accused.

    The eminent Jurists Panel of Apex Court found that the accused was innocent; rather ‘a martyr’. The appellate review highlighted the culpability of the policeman and emphasized the notoriety of his actions. “It further reiterated the condemnation of prosecutor”. The Court, therefore, ordered restoration of victim’s dignity and respect and to compensate for all his losses while pronouncing a ‘Landmark Judgment’.

    In the wake of the concurrent judicial findings of the Court, he should have been restored to his former status and position and adequately compensated for his mental agony and sufferings. Unfortunately, the UAE authority acted in total defiance of the findings and sentiments expressed by the judicial establishments of that country and on September 28, 1996 the petitioner was deported to India as if he was punished for a crime.

    After reaching India, the petitioner has made every effort to uphold his dignity and his rights. In October 1996, a writ petition was filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India. The Supreme Court directed Delhi High Court deal with it. The High Court of Delhi directed the Government to settle the matters within two months. On January 28, 2004 the High Court of Delhi observed in its order that the Government should inform the Court of the steps taken to protect the rights of the petitioner.

    The judgment dated 19-9-2007 of the Delhi High Court had extracted a previous letter of the Government reading: “Shri. Jabir should pursue his legal action already done by him through the UAE Courts. Although under Section 86 cannot be granted for suing the UAE Government, we are taking up the matter with our Embassy in Abu Dhabi once again, requesting them to pursue this case at appropriate level”.

    The petitioner’s letter to the MEA on July 04, 2012 enquiring the status of the case under the Right to Information Act was answered by an evasive reply that they do not have any records of the case with them. The anguish of the citizen can be imagined.

    Under international law, the state is responsible for all actions or omissions of its officials and organs. This is the function of the basic rules of international law concerning the responsibility of States for their internationally wrongful acts and the legal consequences which flow therefrom. The ‘successor governments’ also remain bound by the acts incurred by the ‘predecessor governments’.

    In January 30, 2013 endeavours were made by the petitioner towards a strategy formulation and implementation of ‘Mutual Human Rights Law and Reparation Mechanisms’ between the Government of India and the GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) countries, mandating our elected representatives and officials to eliminate discrimination and imbalances of millions of overseas Indians working in different countries. This also involves the recognition and protection of the dignity and respect of individuals.

    In response, the MEA, New Delhi, explained that the government of India has established various arrangements for the welfare of Indian community and assistance to the distressed Indians abroad. Later, the same ministry has written that whatever the arrangements it made for the welfare of Indian community and assistance to the distressed Indians abroad are only their ‘VISION’ and nothing else!

    The officials of the Ministry of External Affairs should feel themselves guilty of their inaction in protecting the innocent Indians trapped in false cases in the UAE and other Gulf (GCC) countries.

    The tragedy of this generation is that the “victims” are always neglected. Their agonies, losses and sufferings are never resolved. As long as the tears of the victims are not wiped, all the progressions we have made hitherto are only ‘teasing illusions and promises of unreality’.

    [The petitioner’s case had been espoused by a great jurist and Judge of the Supreme Court of India – ‘Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer’.Senior Advocate K. Sukumaran‘, a former Judge of the High Courts of Kerala and Bombay appeared in the matter before the Supreme Court and the High Court of Delhi].

    [P.K. Jabir can be contacted at: info@legalcell.com]

    Legal Instruments & Reference Links:

    Mindful, in particular, that a judgment debt is hanging over the Abu Dhabi Emirate, United Arab Emirates. The judgment is binding and enforceable by the court of Abu Dhabi from where the ruling came from. The Judgment debt of Abu Dhabi, can be eliminated or satisfied by the enforcement of judgments and legal remedies… “Reputation of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates!”

     

  • ‘INDO-GULF REPARATION MECHANISMS’ Timeline Highlighting Submissions & Responses

    Date: 2013.10.18 | Category: Abu Dhabi, Arbitration, Delhi High Court, Dictators, Diplomatic Protection, Freedom of Expression, Human Rights, India, India & UAE, Indian Diplomacy, Indo-Gulf Reparations, International Law, Investors duped, Investors sue UAE, Judgment Creditor, Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer, Legacy of Torture in UAE, Middle East Monitor, Migrant Workers, Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, P.K. Jabir, Reparation Mechanisms, UAE Judgments For Sale, United Arab Emirates, Vienna Conventions | Response: 0

    ‘INDO-GULF REPARATION MECHANISMS’ Timeline Highlighting Submissions & Responses
    18 October, 2013 Delhi

    ENFORCEMENT OF UAE JUDGMENTS:
    TRANSNATIONAL LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION

    Help us reach our goals by making a contribution to enforce the UAE Judgment(s)

    The petitioner, a UAE torture survivor, is aimed to take his case to the next level of courts, the “International Court of Justice and arbitral tribunals”. We need your support to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud and
    other heinous acts to avoid honoring their obligations. …
    Please visit “A Portfolio of UAE Judgments For Sale!’

    External-Affairs-Minister-Salman-Khurshid-embassy-uae2Endeavours made by Shri. Panikkaveetil K. Jabir towards formulation and implementation of a Mutual Human Rights Law and Reparation Mechanisms Between the Government of India and the Gulf (Gulf Cooperation Council – GCC) countries, mandating our elected representatives and officials to eliminate discrimination and imbalances of Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) working in different countries. This also involves the recognition and protection of the dignity of individuals.

    Description of documents – 30-1-2013
    Representation to (1) The Secretary to Government, Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India, South Block, New Delhi-110011 and others. []

    Reply from Hon’ble Minister Salman Khurshid – 15-2-2013

    Reply from Hon’ble Minister Salman Khurshid, Minister of External Affairs, acknowledging receipt of representation; Minister has asked to the concerned department to examine the same. []

    Important Reminder Notice [Reminder No.1] – 20-3-2013

    Important Reminder Notice to the Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, Govt. of India, New Delhi. []

    Reply from the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India – 02-05-2013

    Subsequently, a reply received from the Ministry of External Affairs 02-05-2013: [ ]
    Letter received from Shri A.R.Ghanashyam, Joint Secretary, MEA(Gulf & Hajj), intimating various arrangements/views the Government of India has established for the welfare of Indian community and assistance to the distressed Indians abroad. (The true content of letter followed here below) ·

    Migrant Cell: Government of India has established the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs which deals with the welfare of Indian Community and issues concerning Overseas Citizenship of India, Persons of Indian Origin and Indians abroad.

    MOU with GCC: Several institutional arrangements are in place (including Agreements) with Gulf Countries for assistance to Indian Citizens in the Gulf. · Visits: Ministerial Level visits are periodically undertaken by Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs, Ministry of External Affairs and also Ministers from some State Governments to Gulf Countries. ·

    Educational Arrangements: The Officials dealing with matters pertaining to the welfare of Indian Community abroad are competent and dedicated to their work, with a good understanding of relevant issues. ·

    Participation in other Charters: It is not our policy to interfere in the functioning of Charters of other countries concerning the welfare of their citizens. · Reparation Fund: All Indian Missions in the Gulf have effective and functional institutional mechanisms for extending consular/monetary assistance to distressed Indians including the cost of legal assistance & reparation. [ ]

    The second (Important) reminder notice to the MEA – 10-06 2013

    • The second (important) reminder notice to the Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi expressing concerns in not implementing the order of the Delhi High Court in relation to the applicant’s grievances against the UAE Government, the ‘Appalling Ignorance’ of the Government of India of the functions of Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations 1961 of United Nations, the Arab Charter on Human Rights, adopted in 1994 by the League of Arab States other Charter Provisions, Statutes etc.

    Reply received from the Ministry of External Affairs – 09-07-2013
    (‘Our national shame’ that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs are having only some ‘views’ for the welfare of Indian Community abroad and nothing else!)

    In reply to the above notice, Shri Ashish Middha, the Under Secretary, MEA, has revealed that, the letter dated 02-05-2013, from Mr. Ghanashyam, Joint Secretary, MEA (Gulf & Hajj), conveys ‘ONLY’ the Ministry’s views on various points/captions (Migrant Cell, MOU with GCC, Visits, Educational Arrangements, Participation in other Charters, Reparation Fund) and nothing otherwise. The captions may hence, not be treated as confirmations. [Letter No.58/US(Gulf) dated 9-7-2013[ ]

    Indo – Gulf Reparation Mechanisms – Remarks & EndNote

      • Remarks:
        Shri Vayalar Ravi, the Hon’ble Minister of Overseas Indians Affairs, Govt. of India, is one of the five recipients of the Representation. [Recipients. []
      • The ‘Ministry of Non-Resident Indians’ Affairs’, the earlier version of the ‘Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs’ (MOIA), was created vide notification No. Doc.CD-160/2004 dated 27 May 2004 issued by the President of India, covering a wide range of areas concerning the welfare of overseas Indians, virtually making the Ministry a single window service provider. The Ministry is headed by Cabinet Minister, Shri Vayalar Ravi.
        • Despite the above solemn intention of the Government of India, it is sad to state that even an acknowledgment by way of interim reply, as sought in the representation and the reminders, has not been received from the Hon’ble Minister Shri. Vayalar Ravi nor his Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs].
          [‘It is clear from the above that the apprehension of the petitioner expressed in his second reminder dated 10th June, 2013 addressed to the Secretary of External Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi is correct.’].

        EndNote: “The establishments of institutional arrangements for the welfare of ‘Overseas Indian Community’, as highlighted by the Government of India, are intentionally deceptive, untruthful and purport to demonstrate that there are procedural remedies or tactics. Serious failures and inadequacies to comply with statutory or regulatory obligations on the part of both the Ministries, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) & the ‘Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs’ (MOIA) now stand proved by the subsequent communications received by the petitioner from the Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India”.

        Principal Resource: Updates – Case No 2557 UAE – P.K. Jabir, Lawyers India client


    MORE FEATURES

    ‘India’s national shame’

    The welfare of ‘Overseas Indian Community’, as highlighted by the Government of India, are intentionally deceptive, untruthful and purport to demonstrate that there are procedural remedies or tactics’. More Details

    ‘Nitaqat Law & Years of Human Rights Abuses in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Member States ’

    Since the beginning of 2013, several Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) member states launched intensive raids against undocumented migrant workers as part of Nitaqat Law (Nationalization). As per official estimate, nearly five million Indian migrants are currently living in the Gulf region. The distress and uncertainty facing migrants is extremely concerning; media reports and evidences shows that migrant workers are subject to indefinite detainment in squalid living conditions, treated like dirt, that guest workers have no rights, and receive minimal support from state representatives or diplomatic institutions.More Details

    Human Rights Abuses in the Gulf States – A summary of some recent cases

    The Minister for Overseas Indians Affairs condemned the unscrupulous agents for sending innocents abroad without proper documents. “For the past four years, my Ministry has been carrying advertisement campaigns in various languages. I am sad such campaigns have not delivered results.” Mr. Ravi said. He himself has thus expressed his inability to drive things the right way. It is a known fact that the Overseas Indians Affairs Ministry is yet to ensure safety, security and welfare of Indian migrant workers, suffering on various counts, in the Gulf countries. More Details


    Enforcement of UAE Judgments: Transnational Litigation and Arbitration:
    Help us reach our goals by making a contribution to enforce the UAE Judgment(s)
    Support the petitioner, a UAE torture survivor, who is aimed to take his case to the next level of courts, the “International Court of Justice and Arbitral Tribunals” [ ]

    Reparation News
    India has half the world’s modern slaves: Study
    Sixty-six years after independence, India has the dubious distinction of being home to half the number of modern day slaves in the world. The first Global Slavery Index has estimated that 13.3 to 14.7 million people live like slaves in the country — roughly equal to the population of Kolkata. Full Text: India has half the world’s modern slaves: Study

    Reparation Campaign
    The Sourcebook of ‘Indo-Gulf Reparation Mechanisms’ [You are cordially invited to join us as a Sponsor of the Sourcebook]
    The book exposes ‘the Myths and reality’ of the Ministry of Overseas Indian Affairs & Ministry of Indian External Affairs. The bureaucrats in both the Ministries (MOIA & MEA) are pretends to be public servants, all the while they are greedy blood suckers selling Indian workforce to the so called Gulf States, no matter how deeply their wounds may run. Indian migrants in the Gulf countries are continue to be exposed to the gross violation of Human Rights and exploitation, without due respect of their life and dignity. Full Text: “You are requested to join us as a Sponsor of the Sourcebook”

    Photograph: Hon’ble External Affairs Minister of India, Mr. Salman Khurshid meeting with the UAE Foreign Affairs Minister H.H. Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan in Abu Dhabi, March 13, 2013 (Indian Embassy, UAE).

    Help us reach our goals by making a contribution to enforce the UAE Judgment(s)

    The petitioner, a UAE torture survivor, is aimed to take his case to the next level of courts, the “International Court of Justice and arbitral tribunals” – We need your support to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud and other henious acts to avoid honoring their obligations. …Please visit ‘ The process of getting justice and its implications!’

    Last updated: 20 Oct, 2013

  • What, man, defy the devil: Save mankind from dictators!

    Date: 2013.07.20 | Category: Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Coup Funding, Al-Jazeera, Bahrain, Democracy, Dictators, Egypt Coup Funding, Freedom of Expression, Human Rights, India & UAE, Indian Diplomacy, International Law, Investors sue UAE, Judgment Creditor, Legacy of Torture in UAE, Middle East Monitor, Migrant Workers, Other, Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, United Arab Emirates, Vienna Conventions | Response: 0

    What, man, defy the devil: Save mankind from dictators!
    July 20, 2013

    ITIHAD-ABUDHABI-UAEEtihad Airways, the flag carrier of the UAE, is based at Abu Dhabi International Airport. The money power and the shrewd rulers of Abu Dhabi, it would appear, are out to capture the whole world. At a glance, no one will find anything unusual about the move of that country, under the guise of economic progression, in joining hands with other airlines.

    The dangers of such a collaborative movement, as indicated here are sure to take over the world in general and the involving countries in particular. Once they succeed in these efforts, it is certain that these evildoers would easily make the supporting countries to their ?economic slaves?.

    What, man, defy the devil: Save mankind from dictators!
    18 July, 2013 Reports, UAE Human Rights

    Abu Dhabi is the largest and wealthiest member of the United Arab Emirates. The country is attributed to authoritarian regime in which the government is ruled. Indeed the key challenges facing the UAE includes lack of accountability and total lack of judicial independence remain critical. Abu Dhabi is notorious for it’s Human Rights records, including ?arbitrary arrests, torture, hiring and using foreign mercenaries in order to avoid pro-democracy protests in the Emirates as well as joins hand with their cronies to crush any democratic movements in the region.

    They have been supporting the Egyptian traitors to destroy the nation and make people worse than they are. They mounted up worth $12 billion in aid packages to bless the bloody military coup in Egypt, to restore the old authoritarian order against democracy.

    Etihad Airways, the Abu Dhabi-owned airline, commenced commercial operations in November, 2003, is one of the rapidly expanding airlines under the rule of a tyrant. Etihad has singled out from rivals Qatar Airways and Emirates, in a highly competitive region, by code share agreements with its partners. Etihad purchased nearly 30 percent of Air Berlin, Europe’?s sixth largest carrier, when Lufthansa has tried to block the Gulf carriers’ access to German airports. Aside from Air Berlin, Etihad has expanded its global network through three other equity stakes including a 10 per cent holding in Virgin Australia, a 40 per cent stake in Air Seychelles and smaller stakes in Virgin Australia and Ireland’s Aer Lingus.

    The media has reported that the Etihad Airways and other Gulf Carriers benefits from access to discounted or free aviation fuel, free corporate tax and non-union labour, particularly low-wage contract workers from India and Pakistan. Etihad Airways now converts Abu Dhabi International Airport as a major hub for connecting flights to their final destinations.

    Etihad Airways, the flag carrier of the UAE, is based at Abu Dhabi International Airport. The money power and the shrewd rulers of Abu Dhabi, it would appear, are out to capture the whole world. At a glance, no one will find anything unusual about the move of that country, under the guise of economic progression, in joining hands with other airlines. The dangers of such a collaborative movement, as indicated above are sure to take over the world in general and the involving countries in particular. Once they succeed in these efforts, it is certain that these evildoers would easily make the supporting countries to their ?economic slaves?.

    The history of Abu Dhabi has revealed widespread fraud and financial manipulations in the largest bank fraud in world financial history, described as the BCCI Banking Scandal. The State-owned Etisalat-PTCL?s privatization deal, a multi-billion dollar corruption scandal in Pakistan’s history that followed. Doubtless, the autocratic rulers of Abu Dhabi is empowered with unaccountable wealth from tapping the immense natural oil and gas reserves. The history repeated in India in 2011 as revelations of the ‘2G Spectrum’ case in India foiled another attempt of Etisalat to make illegal gains in partnership with Swan Telecom. Not to mention the old but real stories of child camel jockeys, aged between 2 and 5 kidnapped mainly from Indian sub-continent and for their use in camel jockeying in Abu Dhabi.

    Principal Resources: http://www.judgmentforsale.com/blog/what-man-defy-the-devil-save-mankind-from-dictators/

    ETISALAT, UAE, seek justice after alleged fraud

    etisalat_logonThe greed of the devil for making money by corrupting individuals, corporations or even a country is a never ending process; and its activities are spreading over the entire universe. ETISALAT, UAE, seek justice after alleged fraud

    Reparation Law News: http://www.reparationlaw.com/news/

    UAE Case Laws: http://reparationlaw.com/caselaw/

    Reparation Resources: http://www.reparationlaw.com/resources/

    ENFORCEMENT OF UAE JUDGMENTS: TRANSNATIONAL LITIGATION AND ARBITRATION

    Help us reach our goals by making a contribution to enforce the UAE Judgment(s)

    The petitioner, who is a UAE torture survivor of inside the regime’s brutal prison in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates and most importantly a THREE times of ‘Judgment Creditor’ from the Legal Courts of Abu Dhabi, and still frustrated in the course of enforcing his judgments. He is now aimed to take his case to the next level of courts, the “International Court of Justice and Arbitral Tribunals”.

    We need your active support to expose the debtors who hide Judicial decisions, commit fraud and other henious acts to avoid honoring their obligations. …
    Please visit “A PORTFOLIO OF UAE JUDGMENTS FOR SALE!’’

     

  • Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan – The Making of a Police State

    Date: 2011.12.08 | Category: Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi Coup Funding, Al-Jazeera, Diplomatic Protection, Egypt Coup Funding, Freedom of Expression, Human Rights, India, India & UAE, Indian Diplomacy, International Law, Investors duped, Investors sue UAE, Judgment Creditor, Legacy of Torture in UAE, Middle East Monitor, Migrant Workers, Other, Overseas Indians’ Legal Cell, P.K. Jabir, Protests, punishment, Sheikh Saif, United Arab Emirates, Vienna Conventions | Response: 0

    Saif-bin-Zayed-hands-Major-General-Hamid-Al-Hudaidi-the-Best-Security-Zone-AwardSheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan – The Making of a Police State
    December 8, 2011

    “Sheikh Saif bin Zayed Al Nahyan, UAE’s Minister of Interior, could twist and stop implementing court orders. He has been proved to be the most cruel person the emirates have ever seen. But everything is NOT ending here. The unexecuted final order of the court of records of this state is a proof of evidence that the UAE is led by truly unjust rulers. This will go to prove that what they preach towards protection of Human Rights and what they do have no comparison”

    Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan (1918 – 02 Nov, 2004)

    Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan al-Nahyan was a wise leader who was profoundly loved by his people. He ruled Abu Dhabi since 1966 and was the founding leader of the United Arab Emirates, after seven Arab territories gained independence from Britain in 1971. Sheikh Zayed was regarded as a man of great vision, grew up to guide his nation into the oil age. Sheikh Zayed promoted the growth and development of the country from sleepy backwardness, and transformed it into a modern economic powerhouse.

    During the last leg of his life, a span of 12 years he had been ailing and had a kidney transplant in 2000. Due to a long struggle to a recovery, Zayed was ineffective in the Emirates’day-to-day decision making for over a decade. The open-door policy adopted by Sheikh Zayed between the ruler and the ruled had gone to oblivion. Zayed died at the age of 86. He was survived by his wife Fatima, his 21 sons and about 14 daughters.

    The present UAE is led by two chief sheikhs from the regional regime of Abu Dhabi, who is first in importance the hereditary emir and president of the country, Sheikh Khalifa bin Zayed Al Nahyan, born in 1948, succeeded his father Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan on 03 November 2004. The other is his younger brother General Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, born in 1961, is the next in line to become President of the United Arab Emirates after Sheikh Khalifa. Sheikh Mohammed became Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi in November 2004 and since then he became the Chairman of the Abu Dhabi Executive Council. In January 2005 he was appointed Deputy Supreme Commander of the UAE Armed Forces. Later he was promoted to the rank of General.

    There are quite a few Zayed’s siblings who actively supports the above two principal sheikhs are Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, Minister of Foreign Affairs; another brother, Sheikh Hazza bin Zayed Al-Nahyan, is the UAE’s national security advisor and director of state security while Sheikh Saif bin Zayed al Nahyan, a half-brother, is deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Interiors.

    General Sheikh Saif Bin Zayed Al Nahyan is the UAE’s Minister of Interior since October 2004. He was the Deputy Director of the Capital Police in 1994–1995 before becoming the Director General of the Abu Dhabi Police on October 23, 1995. Sheikh Saif was blamed for the vast majority of human rights violations committed in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.

    Prior to his ministerial appointment he has occupied several leadership positions in Abu Dhabi Emirate. It’s probably the reason Sheikh Saif’s instinctive criminal behavior, that is chiefly satisfied by the UAE tyrants. He is the full brother of Sheikh Issa, who poured lighter fluid over a man’s genitals, which he then sets alight, the man who ran over him with a Mercedes SUV etc (View Video) explicitly illustrated through the sociopathic mentality of some of these royal families who get off on torturing ‘slaves’ and other unfortunates. Read full article here: UAE, the making of a Police State

    Last updated: 14 Dec, 2011

    UAE Forum: Promoting Human Rights & Democratic Values in the Digital Age. Let’s Join

    ‘Oh, I have lost my reputation! I have lost the immortal part of myself, and what remains is bestial’. The Executive of the State was duty bound to adhere to the orders of the Judiciary of the land. Flouting the orders of a judicial body is totally destructive of the Rules of Law and norms internationally upheld for safeguarding Human Rights. “Reputation of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates!”

     

View Events

Recent Events

car wheels and rims
car rims